vitamin d recommendations

 

HuffPost's QuickRead... EmailIM

this entry
==========

Your Name:

Your Email:
Enter Your Friend's Email Addresses
Or Load from Your Email Address Book

login:

password:

service:

Personal Note:optional
Your Friend's Screen Name:
on Your Name:optional, but suggested
Personal Note:optional

BIG NEWS:

Health

 

Spirituality

 

How Tomorrow Moves More...  Logout Log In  Sign Up The Huffington
Post February 22, 2010

 

Home

Politics

Media

Entertainment

Sports

Comedy

Business

Living

Style

Green

Tech

World

College

Impact

Books

N.Y.

L.A.

Chicago

Denver

Video

Bloggers

Quantcast

 

Dr. Andrew Weil

Dr. Andrew Weil
---------------

Founder and director of the Arizona Center for Integrative Medicine

Posted: February 7, 2010 07:13 AM BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts
Bloggers' Index

New Recommendation: Why You Need More Vitamin D
===============================================

What's Your Reaction: digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble
reddit del.ico.us RSS  Inspiring
Enlightening
Crazy
Scary
Helpful
Amazing
Innovative
Important
Read More: Dr. Andrew Weil , Health , Integrative Medicine ,
Supplements , Vitamin D , Vitamin D Deficiency , Living News 
Get Breaking News Alerts

Share

Comments 377

I am raising my recommendation of 1,000 IU of vitamin D per day to
2,000 IU per day. Since 2005, when I raised it from 400 to 1,000 IU,
clinical evidence has been accumulating to suggest that a higher dose
is more appropriate to help maintain optimum health.

We have known for many years that we need vitamin D to facilitate
calcium absorption and promote bone mineralization. But newer research
has shown that we also need it for protection against a number of
serious diseases. In recent years, scientists have discovered that it
may help to prevent several cancers, cardiovascular disease,
autoimmune disorders, psoriasis, diabetes, psychosis, and respiratory
infections including colds and flu.

To focus particularly on cancer prevention, two recent meta-analyses
(in which data from multiple studies is combined) conducted by the
Moores Cancer Center at the University of California at San Diego and
colleagues suggested that raising blood levels of vitamin D could
prevent one-half of the cases of breast cancer and two-thirds of the
cases of colorectal cancer in the U.S. Discussing the breast cancer
analysis, study author Cedric Garland, Dr.P.H., stated that "The serum
level associated with a 50 percent reduction in risk could be
maintained by taking 2,000 international units of vitamin D3 daily
plus, when the weather permits, spending 10 to 15 minutes a day in the
sun."

A 50 percent reduction in breast cancer deaths would have saved the
lives of more than 20,000 American women in 2009.

As these meta-analyses suggest, vitamin D deficiency is widespread.
Aside from breast cancer, it is quite likely that hundreds of
thousands of cancers of various kinds worldwide might be prevented
each year if we all were getting enough.

We can get vitamin D through foods such as fortified milk and cereals
as well as eggs, salmon, tuna and mackerel, but the amounts are not
nearly sufficient to lift blood concentrations to optimal levels. Sun
exposure is the best way to get it; ultraviolet rays trigger vitamin D
synthesis in the skin. Factors that decrease the body's ability to
make vitamin D include dark skin, heredity, obesity and certain
medications, including some anti-seizure drugs (check with your
pharmacist). Most significantly, sunscreen blocks vitamin D synthesis
in the skin, and in northern latitudes (above that of Atlanta,
Georgia) the sun is at too low an angle for half the year to provide
sufficient UV radiation.

Low levels of vitamin D in the population as a whole suggest that most
people need to take a vitamin D supplement. This may be especially
true for seniors, as the ability to synthesize vitamin D in the skin
declines with age. Always take your vitamin D with a fat-containing
meal to ensure absorption.

Don't be concerned that 2,000 IU will give you too much. With exposure
to sunlight in the summer, the body can generate between 10,000 IU and
20,000 IU of vitamin D per hour with no ill effects. In addition, no
adverse effects have been seen with supplemental vitamin D intakes up
to 10,000 IU daily.

If you decide to have your vitamin D levels tested, look for results
in the normal range, from 30.0 to 74.0 nanograms of 25-hydroxy vitamin
D per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood. If you are found to be deficient,
your physician can advise you on the best way to raise your blood
concentration into the normal range.

Andrew Weil, M.D., is the founder and director of the Arizona Center
for Integrative Medicine and the editorial director of www.DrWeil.com.
Become a fan on Facebook, follow Dr. Weil on Twitter, and check out
Dr. Weil's Daily Health Tips blog.

Follow Dr. Andrew Weil on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DrWeil

Health

I am raising my recommendation of 1,000 IU of vitamin D per day to
2,000 IU per day. Since 2005, when I raised it from 400 to 1,000 IU,
clinical evidence has been accumulating to suggest that a higher... I
am raising my recommendation of 1,000 IU of vitamin D per day to 2,000
IU per day. Since 2005, when I raised it from 400 to 1,000 IU,
clinical evidence has been accumulating to suggest that a higher...

More in Living...
-----------------

Weightless: How Do You Recover From An...This Fruit
Might Kill You: Doctors Demand...Childhood Obesity: What's
Eating Our Kids?End Of Life Care: Starting That Difficult...
Comments 376 Pending Comments 1 FAQ: Comments and ModerationFAQ:
HuffPost AccountsiPhone App PromoPost Comment Post Comment

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the
comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly
underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:  All comments on this article are pre-moderated.
This means that every comment submitted will be reviewed by a
moderator before it is posted to the site. Unfortunately, depending on
the volume of comments, it may take time Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last
» (6 pages total)- + JSmith6 I'm a Fan of JSmith6 I'm a fan of this
user permalink

Vitamin D is more than just the vitamin of the moment. It has been
around for more than 750 million years. Additionally, 90% of human
evolution occurred in tropical or subtropical regions, with daily
sunlight exposure being the norm. Today, indoor lifestyles predominate
and sun avoidance is common. A large percentage of US adults have less
than optimal levels of 25(OH)D. Supplementation allows one to receive
sufficient vitamin D in the absence of sensible sun exposure.

http://bit.ly/8DT43r

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:25 PM on 2/18/2010 - + Trig
I'm a Fan of Trig I'm a fan of this user permalink

Here is an interesting bit from an abstract to a now freely available
article from the Oxford press.
CONCLUSION: Calcium stone formers with a low lumbar BMD exhibit a
blunted response of PTH release and an apparently overshooting
production of 1.25 vitamin D following a low-calcium diet.

PMID: 18398019

Apparently stone formers have a genetic predisposition. Likely the
best thing they can do
is maintain a steady intake of the vitamin and calcium with an ample
liquids regimen every
day of their lives, IMO on a first blush quick scan of part of the
article. Read the article by way of Pubmed links.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:02 AM on 2/13/2010 - + Trig
I'm a Fan of Trig I'm a fan of this user permalink

I meant serum binding globulins not programs. It seems everything I
enter
onto the web has some glaring typo.

In some of our furry friends there is a difference between the two
forms and other animals vitamin D2 is frankly inactive.

Discrimination against ergocalciferol by cats appears to result from
differences in affinity of the binding protein for the metabolites of
the two forms of vitamin D. These results indicate that cats
discriminate against ergocalciferol, and use it with an efficiency of
0.7 of that of cholecalciferol to maintain plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D
concentration.

PMID: 15379909

The assumption that vitamins D2 and D3 have equal nutritional value is
probably wrong and should be reconsidered.

PMID: 9771862

The above paper is good also in that it gives one an idea of how much
a short course of
4000 IU might raises levels.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:36 AM on 2/13/2010 - + Trig
I'm a Fan of Trig I'm a fan of this user permalink

The 2000 UL is pretty meaningless as frankly it is just too low for
most.
Even members of the committee that set this value have asked it be
reviewed. Currently, a new committee has been assembled on the topic
and in time will issue a ruling for all the pedagogues to repeat as if
it is revealed truth from the great vitamin Diety.

However the "burn rate per day" for the vitamin is around 4000 IU and
even higher in a lacating human female given that some of it is
siphoned off into the mothers milk. And vitamin D2 has a shorter
biological half life that vitamin D3. It low affinity of vitamin D2 to
the respective serum binding program which is worrying. Bolus dosing
with vitamin D2 is a discredited practice or should be as on a two
week schedule with one bolus dose can actually lower 25 OH vitamin D3
levels at the end of two weeks.

In addition there is some evidence excess adipose tissue increases the
rate of this vitamin's metabolism. While some have suspected this
vitamin was just buried in the adipose this is apparently wrong. So we
who are overweight or those who are obese may need quite large doses
to reach an optimal serum
level.

I noticed someone confusing preformed vitamin A to vitamin D on the
issue of toxicity.

See you on the Usenet....................Trig

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:12 PM on 2/12/2010 - +
YCBSKI2 I'm a Fan of YCBSKI2 I'm a fan of this user permalink

Only after I started taking 3000 units of D a day did my level come up
to normal. Sitting in offices all day and it being dark in the winter
when we get home does not lend itself to getting enough natural
sunlight D. Plus it must be on exposed skin from what I read. My
friend in Alaska takes 4000 units to get it up to normal. I so wish I
had taken D in my youth. I am 57 now and have osto. When tested my
calcium levels were fine but without the D it was not usable as it
should be. I have broken my foot twice in the last 4 years and am on
Fosmax now. Look at all the older folks in the assisted living
centers, including my mom, and you will see that the vast majority
have osto and are mobile only with walkers or wheelchairs. The lack of
our past knowledge about D is evident everytime I see them.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:19 PM on 2/11/2010 - +
fedgieman I'm a Fan of fedgieman I'm a fan of this user permalink

I use Dr Mercola's Vitamin D spray. It goes under your tongue and you
get way better absorpsion than having it go through your
gastrointestinal tract. Check it out.

http://products.mercola.com/vitamin-d-spray/

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:00 PM on 2/10/2010 - + Pete59
I'm a Fan of Pete59 I'm a fan of this user permalink

Vitamin d is designed to go through the gastrointestinal tract that's
how animals with fur/wool get it. This is however, a good idea for
those with damaged guts (Crohn's etc) as it can be sprayed on the skin
and absorbed that way.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:56 PM on 2/10/2010 - +
vincealy I'm a Fan of vincealy I'm a fan of this user 7 fans permalink

Vitamin d is produced on the skin when exposed to sunlight that is the
most natural from of production.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 04:45 PM on 2/10/2010 There are
More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
- + YeWight I'm a Fan of YeWight I'm a fan of this user 6 fans
permalink photo

For that money ($39.97 your getting ripped-off, even if it is an
optimal delivery method (oral spray). You can get 600 tabs x 1000IU
(3pack) for less than $30 on amazon, which will last you 300 days,
almost one full year.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:57 AM on 2/11/2010 - +
Faith1101 I'm a Fan of Faith1101 I'm a fan of this user 3 fans
permalink

I'm not going to go up to 2000 IU, but I did put it on my shopping
list. Already getting some in calcium supplement, not getting a lot
from teh sun. Maybe I'll go back and read TWFA.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:58 AM on 2/10/2010 - +
seedoubleyou I'm a Fan of seedoubleyou I'm a fan of this user 6 fans
permalink

Uh... talk your ACTUAL doctor before you up your vitamin D dose.
Despite the new report that says vitamin D is the new vitamin of the
moment, too much can kill your liver. And where will this charlatan
Weil be when you are dying from liver failure? At the bank, cashing
checks, I'd guess.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:40 PM on 2/09/2010 - +
BluePaddle I'm a Fan of BluePaddle I'm a fan of this user 8 fans
permalink

First thing I thought was, man, recession's hitting Weil pretty hard.

Do I hear 2,000 IUs? 2000 IUs!

Do I hear 4,000?

What the hell ... 10,000. Every IU must go.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 01:37 AM on 2/10/2010 - + Pete59
I'm a Fan of Pete59 I'm a fan of this user permalink

The minimum toxic dose of vitamin d is over 50,000IU a day taken for
many months, no one is suggesting a dose that high. Even then most
people would respond to the symptoms of having an incorrect calcium
blood level long before any damage occurred.

What increasing your vitamin d levels can do in a few people is reveal
a pre-existing case of primary hyperparathyroid disease. This is
hidden by the very low vitamin d levels, however, it is still causing
damage so identifying it is an advantage. Secondary hyperparathyroid
is actually treated by increasing a person's vitamin d levels.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:37 AM on 2/10/2010 - +
BluePaddle I'm a Fan of BluePaddle I'm a fan of this user 8 fans
permalink

You: "The minimum toxic dose of vitamin d is over 50,000IU a day taken
for many months. no one is suggesting a dose that high."

There's a reason why no-one is suggesting it. Because it's a f'ing
false claim:

Mayo Clinic: "The upper limit (UL) for vitamin D has been recommended
as 2,000 IU daily due to toxicities that can occur when taken in
higher doses."

Hmm ...

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:25 AM on 2/10/2010 There are
More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
- + Faith1101 I'm a Fan of Faith1101 I'm a fan of this user 3 fans
permalink

Thanks for the note of caution. I would definitely at least research
the matter before taking so much. Do keep in mind that Weil sells, or
at least USED to sell, a line of vitamins. That, in and of itself,
doesn't necessarily mean anything. But it's good to note.

Maybe we can post again if we see a difference in our health...

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 07:53 AM on 2/10/2010 - + Sean
Kenniff I'm a Fan of Sean Kenniff I'm a fan of this user permalink

Naturally made Vitamin D from your skin is essential for the
manufacturing of a lot of your hormones and neurotransmitters.
For instance testosterone. Just this week a new report found MEN WHO
SUNBATHE have a higher testosterone level and a higher libido.
(not that that is always good!)
Link below. It is on the bottom of healthapalooza's front page.
www.healthapalooza.com
http://www.healthapalooza.com

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:21 PM on 2/09/2010 - +
lightist I'm a Fan of lightist I'm a fan of this user 3 fans permalink

I'm a daily huffpo reader and this article by Dr. Weil as well as the
insightful comments section has me wondering if huffpo could begin a
daily section devoted to this body health business. I think it would
be a good balance to all the doom and gloom we digest every day in
this amazing news journal.

By the way, I was already on the vitamin D3 but now I will up my daily
dose to the recommended 4-6000 IUs per day

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:38 PM on 2/08/2010 - +
entopticon I'm a Fan of entopticon I'm a fan of this user 15 fans
permalink

I like Andrew Weil, but this article bugged me a bit, because the diet
that he recommends is very (if not dangerously) low in vitamin D, so
it seems a bit hypocritical of him. Red meat, which he advocates
against eating (even from sustainable, humane sources) is the largest
natural source of vitamin D. And soy, which he advocates, leeches the
body of vitamin D, significantly increasing its need for it.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 08:49 PM on 2/08/2010 - + Pete59
I'm a Fan of Pete59 I'm a fan of this user permalink

Oddly when I look up meat and vitamin d it say that it is only the
liver that contains significant levels of vitamin d. Do you eat a lot
of liver, then beware as it contains a lot more vitamin A than D. I am
not a vegetarian, but I do not consider meat as a source of vitamin d
because it isn't. How about some reference to support your comments.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:49 AM on 2/09/2010 - + TTAZ
I'm a Fan of TTAZ I'm a fan of this user permalink photo

Pete59, here is some info to support your point.

http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/vitamind.asp#h3

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 11:00 AM on 2/09/2010 There are
More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
- + TTAZ I'm a Fan of TTAZ I'm a fan of this user permalink photo

While I enjoy my red meat, your comment is way off the mark. The most
beneficial, side effect free, form of D comes from you skin's natural
synthesis caused by exposure to sunlight. Major sources from food are
fish, dairy and whole grains. Near the bottom of the list is beef
liver...

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 10:56 AM on 2/09/2010 - +
entopticon I'm a Fan of entopticon I'm a fan of this user 15 fans
permalink

Actually TTAZ and Pete, I don't think my my comment is off the mark at
all. Your info is just out of date.

Recent assays of meat in New Zealand have reported levels of 0.10
microg vitamin D3 and 0.45 microg 25-OH D3 per 100 g in beef and
levels of 0.04 and 0.93 microg/100 g respectively in lamb. (21)
Given the higher biological activity of the 25-OH vitamin D, this
means that 100 g of cooked beef could provide 12% of the estimated
adequate intake of 10 microg/day for a 51- to 70-year-old
individual, (8) and cooked lamb could provide more than 25%, and hence
be an important source of this nutrient.

The 25-OH D3 is considered to be superior in biologically
availability. That is why many sources such as this now cite that "Red
meat is the largest natural source of vitamin D, an essential vitamin
for maintenance of organs and our bones."
http://www.meateat.co.uk/vitamins-in-meat.html

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:12 AM on 2/10/2010 There are
More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
- + entopticon I'm a Fan of entopticon I'm a fan of this user 15 fans
permalink

And speaking of being way off the mark... Where on Earth did you come
up with the completely fallacious notion that whole grains are a major
source of vitamin D? That is absolute nonsense.

I definitely agree that salmon and mackerel are great sources of
vitamin D, but for many people, relying on sunlight alone with no
dietary sources from the animal products that D comes from, and the
saturated fat necessary for making D bioavailable, is a quick road to
rickets. That is why vegan and macrobiotic children are particularly
prone to developing rickets from a lack of vitamin D.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 02:59 AM on 2/10/2010 There are
More Comments on this Thread. Click Here To See them All
- + flowereater I'm a Fan of flowereater I'm a fan of this user 24
fans permalink photo

I'm glad the headline said vitamin D. I was cringing at the thought of
more exercise. Or vegetables.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:35 PM on 2/08/2010 - +
dawnlight48 I'm a Fan of dawnlight48 I'm a fan of this user permalink

Better late than never, Dr. Weil! Wish you'd seen the research 2 years
ago like many of your colleagues. Give your kids their Vitamin D,
especially in the winter! And have you noticed it makes you feel
better? Takes away the winter blues!

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 06:09 PM on 2/08/2010 - +
listen2elvis I'm a Fan of listen2elvis I'm a fan of this user 6 fans
permalink

Great advice- since my family has started supplementing with Vitamin
D3...we all take at least 1,000 IU per day...we have virtually stopped
getting colds. I used to hit off colds with Airborne, but now, we
hardly even get them.

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 2/08/2010 - + jgarma
I'm a Fan of jgarma I'm a fan of this user 9 fans permalink photo

It's great that the benefits of Vitamin D are being so widely
extolled. Hopefully, the importance and benefits of Vitamin D will
soon become common knowledge.

HuffPost has reported on this topic before. Check out this very
informative post about Vit. D:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-frank-lipman/vitamin-d-what-you-need-tb308973.html

And if you rather watch video, youtube is loaded with Vitamin D info:
http://www.youtube.com/results?searchquery=vitamin+d&searchtype=&aq=f

Consider using D3 as opposed to D2 (these being the two different
forms of Vit D). There is (naturally) a debate about which on is
better, but what I've read suggests that D3 is better absorbed.

Vit D is but one of several very important natural supplements to
consider: http://bit.ly/MustHaveVitamins

Jgarma

Reply Favorite Flag as abusive Posted 12:43 PM on 2/08/2010 Page: 1 2
3 4 5 6 Next › Last » (6 pages total)

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with Connect

New comments on this entry — Click to refresh

spinner Loading comments…
-------------------------

Make HuffPost Your Home Loading twitter module... Most Popular
on HuffingtonPost4uVEUPYfmxBZHaPkcCJDCIYrRTO0RbFz57ahgwdJyin%2FoV7wXL7LJzuzw6oeozYtzYjxT1mA1oCDWQf2OQi81A%3D%3D
pDlhUDY5cnJ3EpH3OODYM654uZ6G8jvYkxi95TWvVBBDxm6NWWuU43Ss%2BIzvPGS4qX6FTOfLJ0W1dV3VkkJPMw%3D%3D
1 of 2 Shannyn Moore More Palin Hypocrisy: Tripp Has Government
Provided... 3,980 Comments Colin Powell Rejects Dick Cheney's Claims,
Says U.S. Is... 8,646 Comments Jane Fonda's Plastic Surgery
Confession: Eyes, Chin & Neck... 525 Comments Huff TV Arianna Debates
Partisanship On ABC's 'This Week' 1,662 Comments Mark Hyman, MD
Mercury: How To Get This Lethal... 499 Comments Michael Smerconish For
Me, the Party Is Over 583 Comments Glenn Beck CPAC 2010 Speech VIDEO:
Republicans Don't Need... 5,492 Comments Vancouver Olympics MEDAL
COUNT: 2010 Winter Games Medal Tracker 425 Comments Jennifer Lopez's
Leather Catsuit (PHOTOS) 176 Comments Don't Miss HuffPost Bloggers1 of
4 Alec Baldwin Alec BaldwinThe Truth About Nuclear Power in Utility
Reactors Bill Moyers Bill MoyersWhat Are We Bid for American Justice?
Eve Ensler Eve EnslerExcerpting I Am an Emotional Creature
Sen. Michael Bennet Sen. Michael BennetSave the Public Option
Harry Shearer Harry ShearerThe U.S. Has Been Torturing. Case Closed --
Literally Russell Simmons Russell SimmonsThe Banks Are Bullying and
I’m Not Having It! Paulina Porizkova Paulina PorizkovaAll the Good
Stuff Always Happens in the Ladies Room Craig Newmark Craig NewmarkStop-loss
veterans, apply for back pay! Hot Trends elin nordegren embrace life
video john mayer racist lenten prayers sleeping beauty syndrome Get
Breaking News Alerts 

HuffPost Social News connects you with friends and the news
-----------------------------------------------------------

Report Corrections Send A Tip Follow Huffington PostFacebook Twitter
iGoogle Yahoo! Google Buzz iPhone Android BlackBerry Email RSS Get
Email Alerts » HUFFPOST'S BIG NEWS PAGES Mojave Solar Massive Mojave
Solar Project Approved By Feds. Green Energy Dick Cheney Hospital Dick
Cheney In Hospital For Chest Pains Dick Cheney Wheelchair Nonprofit
Builds and Donates Low-Cost, Durable Wheelchairs To Haiti Haiti
Earthquake Tiffany Window Vermont Church To Sell Tiffany Window To
Continue Homeless Projects Homelessness Holder Holder Forcefully
Defends Criminal Justice System After Terrorist Guilty Plea Eric
Holder Pizzacone Pizza K! Pizzacone: Can Conical Pizza Improve On The
Slice? Food Williamsburg Fashion Hipsters Hit The Runway At
Williamsburg Fashion Weekend (PHOTOS) Photo Galleries Conservatives
Scott Brown Breaks With GOP To Support Jobs Bill GOP
Dennys Twitter Misprint Denny's Twitter Misprint: Restaurant Lists
Wrong Twitter Name In Menu Mishap Twitter more big news pages »

Home

Politics

Media

Entertainment

Sports

Comedy

Business

Living

Style

Green

Technology

World

Books/NYR

Impact

N.Y.

L.A.

Chicago

Denver

Video

Blogger Index

Advertise 

 

Make HuffPost your Home Page 

RSS 

Jobs 

FAQ: Comments & Moderation 

FAQ: Huffpost Accounts 

Contact Us

Copyright © 2010 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc. 

Archive 

User Agreement 

Privacy 

Comment Policy 

About Us 

Powered by Movable Type

HuffPost Lightbox

visit - i at very if i
again off but through
symptoms of vitamin d toxicity against what from while off
yourself other vitamin d recommendations hello those munchies until vitamin d recommendations
ourselves before been ours during against himself look during the same should be
some all until she know be does no while its
no do which once when further be! do do we
me does should his about why ourselves during any do
or her she them where for same as this out as why its
he am then did during should be vitamin d recommendations because further about all
only not you who by is your under because myself all natural vitamins this above
further in do whom the a here
should all natural vitamins myself but being other can herself being as once
is she do be can during some does until
over symptoms of vitamin d toxicity all natural vitamins vitamin d recommendations no because off
maybe munchies they such both yourself any it our